Watchmen (2019) versus Alan Moore's comics

The only case in this corpus where an adaptation chooses to be a sequel. Decryption source by source, without disclosing the outcomes.

As in each article in this series, only verified information (creators, distribution, dates, publishers) is stated; the comparative analysis is ours, without reproducing dialogue or protected images.

1986: a work born from a refusal

We must begin with a fact that few readers know, and which clarifies everything else.

Watchmen should not exist in this form. Alan Moore proposed to DC a story using the Charlton hero— Captain Atom, Blue Beetle, the Question, Nightshade, Peacemaker — a catalog that the publisher had just acquired in 1983. The editorial refused: the story made these characters unusable afterwards.

Moore therefore created equivalents. Doctor Manhattan for Captain Atom, the Owl for Blue Beetle, Rorschach for the Question, the Silky Ghost for Nightshade, and the Comedian from Peacemaker.

This refusal was decisive. New characters allowed what licensed characters would never have allowed: to permanently damage them. This is a rare and instructive case — an editorial constraint which, by closing a door, produced a work far superior to that which was intended.

The comic appeared in twelve issues between 1986 and 1987, with Dave Gibbons drawing. Its form is as famous as its story: a grid of nine squares maintained with almost maniacal rigor, and prose documents interspersed between the chapters.

2009: transcription, and its failure

This corpus examinedthe 2009 film, who chose maximum fidelity: shots reproducing the boxes, a closely followed plot.

The observation that emerged is worth remembering, because the 2019 series is a direct consequence. The shot-by-shot transcription does not restore the work, because what makes Watchmen is not not in the pictures but in their arrangement: the grid, the visual rhymes between chapters, the reading that can be interrupted and resumed. A film that copies images copies what is copied, and leaves the rest.

After 2009, the transcription pathway was therefore exhausted. Any new attempt had to do something else — or give up.

2019: do not adapt, continue

The series chooses the only remaining option: it is located thirty-four years later the events of the comic, in the same world, with new protagonists.

It is therefore not an adaptation in the sense of this corpus. It's a following— and this solves several insoluble problems at once. No plan-to-plan comparison is possible, since there is no original plan. The form of the comic does not have to be transposed, since it is not a question of telling it. And the outcome of 1987 does not need to be reproduced: it has become history, with its political consequences.

This body of work has encountered film sequels and sequels without a source, but never this case: an adaptation that extends the comic instead of remaking it. This is a position that the paper knows well - this is what every series revival does - and that the screen had not tried on a closed work.

What the series replaces, and why it's consistent

The 1986 comic is about the cold war. His anguish is nuclear, his horizon is annihilation, his question is the acceptable price to avoid it. This subject belongs to its time.

The series substitutes another subject: the American racial question. It opens with the Tulsa Massacre of 1921, a real-life episode in which a thriving black neighborhood was destroyed and its residents killed — a fact long absent from textbooks.

The replacement might seem arbitrary. It is not, and the reason lies in the structure of the original work. Watchmen is not a story about the bomb: it is a story about what societies agree not to look at, and the masks — literally and figuratively — that make this blindness comfortable. This device is transposable; nuclear anxiety was no longer.

The series therefore retains the gesture and change the object. This is exactly the distinction that this corpus has formulated regardingPlanet Hulk: an adaptation takes a story, a borrowing takes a setting. Here, neither — she takes a method.

The characters, from paper to screen

• The new protagonists— Created for the series, with no equivalent on paper.
• Survivors of 1986— Present, aged, marked by the outcome.
• The mask— Political object, like in the comic, but displaced.
• Tulsa— Real location, historical anchor of the series.
• The documents— The interlayer process, transposed to the screen.

Alan Moore, or the author who refuses

A word about a situation which has no equivalent in this corpus.

Alan Moore has long refused to be associated with adaptations of his works. He requested that his name be removed and declines the corresponding income. This corpus encountered this position regardingFrom Helland ofV for Vendetta.

The cause is known and is due to the 1986 contract: the rights were to revert to the authors once the title was exhausted - a clause which, with the publisher keeping the work in permanent print, has never come into play. Dave Gibbons took a more measured stance.

This situation creates a difficulty that goes beyond the personal case. Watchmen is one of the few comics recognized outside the industry; it is also one of the rare ones of which the author considers to have been dispossessed. Each new exploitation revives the question.

For the reader, this is a useful point of vigilance. The fact that a work is extensively exploited does not indicate that its authors profit from it. The contractual conditions of the 1980s were very unfavorable for creators, and some of the most profitable titles in the catalog fall into this situation.

Transposing the dividers: the real tour de force

There remains one technical point where the series succeeds where the film failed, and it deserves to be detailed.

The 1986 comic alternates drawn chapters and prose documents: extracts from autobiography, press clippings, reports, internal notes. These pages do not tell the action - they construct the world by accumulating traces, and give the reader the feeling of digging through archives rather than following a story.

The 2009 film left them aside due to lack of space. It was understandable and it was a loss: these documents carry a good half of what makes the work dense.

The series transposes them, and by a means that only television allows:long time. Entire episodes change point of view, register or period, exactly as an intercalary interrupts the reading. The spectator loses his comfort of following — and gains the same archive sensation.

This is a lesson that this corpus has not yet formulated so clearly. Paper processes cannot be transposed by resemblance but by function: what matters is not putting documents on the screen, it is reproducing the effect they produce. An adaptation that seeks the visual equivalent fails; the one who seeks the equivalent of experience succeeds.

Collection side: which numbers to aim for after the series

Watchmen #1(1986) is the gateway, and its profile is particular.

The title was very well printed - it was a announced editorial event - and it has remained in print continuously since then, in the form of a collection. The consequence is clear: the raw number can be found easily and for little money.

The value has therefore shifted entirely towards certified senior ranks. This is the mechanism that this corpus described with regard to the keys of the 1980s and 1990s: when a number is common but historically major, only the impeccable copy has a significant value. The step between a 9.6 and a 9.8 is more decisive than on any silver age key.

The series also designates, indirectly, a second path more interesting for the researcher: the Charlton comics from the 1960s, which features the characters Moore wanted to use. Fightin' 5 #40 (1966) contains the first appearance of Peacemaker, model of the Comedian. These issues are obscure, in small print runs, and have remained undemanded for a long time – therefore accessible.

This is a path that this corpus regularly recommends:sources of a famous work remain much less expensive than the work itself, even though they tell a richer story. As always, condition and gradation determine value; relying on real recent sales is strongly recommended.

Where to start reading

Watchmen #1(1986) obviously, but with a methodological recommendation: read the twelve issues separately rather than as a collection. The break between chapters and the intercalary documents are designed for this split reading, and the collection swallows them up.

Timeline to know

• 1966— Fightin' 5 #40: Peacemaker's first appearance at Charlton.
• 1983— DC acquires Charlton Heroes.
• 1986-1987— Watchmen #1-12, after the refusal to use these heroes.
• 2009— The film transcribes the images, and lacks the form.
• 2019— The series gives up adapting and chooses to continue.

Its place in the saga and for the collector

This series will remain as the only case in this corpus where an adaptation chooses to be a following— a position that paper has always practiced and that the screen has never attempted on a closed work. It demonstrates that after the failure of faithful transcription, the path open is not a better transcription but a change in nature. She also recalls that Watchmen was born from an editorial refusal, and that its author considers himself dispossessed of what it has become. For the collector, it leads to a common number whose entire value has taken refuge in the high grades - and towards the obscure Charltons, who are much more interesting to seek out.

The verdict: the method kept, the subject replaced

• Loyalty: the alternative world of 1986, the consequences of the outcome, the mask as a political object, the transposed intermediary documents and the distrust towards the vigilante.
• Freedoms: an action thirty-four years later, entirely new protagonists, the racial question in place of the Cold War, the untransposed grid and Tulsa in place of New York.
• Collectible numbers: Watchmen #1 (1986) in high grade, Fightin' 5 #40 (1966) and the Charltons of the 1960s.

The 2009 film copied everything that was copied. There was only one thing left to do: no longer adapt at all. It's the only way found, in thirty years, to bring Watchmen to the screen without betraying it — and it consists of not bringing it.

Frequently asked questions