Hellboy (2019) Neil Marshall , with David Harbor and Milla Jovovich, restarts the franchise, this time adapting real bows of Mike Mignola — Darkness Calls , The Wild Hunt , The Storm and the Fury— where del Toro's films were inventive. More faithful to the letter, it was nevertheless a failure. Here is the detailed comparison, film versus comics.
A reboot closer to the albums than its predecessors, and yet much less loved: Hellboy 2019 is a textbook case on the limits of fidelity. Source-by-source decryption.
As in each article in this series, only verified information (creators, distribution, dates, publishers) is stated; the comparative analysis is ours, without reproducing dialogue or protected images.
Title : Hellboy (2019)
Director: Neil Marshall
Actors: David Harbor (Hellboy), Milla Jovovich (Nimue), Ian McShane (Broom), Sasha Lane (Alice Monaghan), Daniel Dae Kim (Ben Daimio)
Scenario : Andrew Cosby
Exit : 2019 — Lionsgate
Darkness Calls— Mignola & Duncan Fegredo
The Wild Hunt— the saga of Nimue
The Storm and the Fury— the conclusion of the cycle
Hellboy in Mexico— fragments shown on screen
- Nimue, the Blood Queen, antagonist of a real cycle.
- Ancestry Arthurian from Hellboy.
- Alice Monaghan and Ben Daimio, characters in the corpus.
- La Wild Hunt and the giants of England.
- La violence and the dark tone of the albums.
- Several entire cycles compressed into a single film.
- Of the years of slow rise reduced to two hours.
- The tone contemplative by Mignola becomes continuous action.
- No continuity with the del Toro films.
- Le silence boxes, impossible to transpose.
A reboot that returns to albums
After two Guillermo del Toro films and a decade of waiting for a third part that never came, the franchise started from scratch in 2019 with a change of studio, director and performer: Neil Marshall as director, David Harbor under makeup, Lionsgate as producer, on a script by Andrew Cosby. The stated bias is clear: return to the published material. Mike Mignola, associated with the project, confirmed that the film draws from several of his cycles —Darkness Calls , The Wild Hunt and The Storm and the Fury—, while taking up fragments of other stories, including the character's Mexican adventures.
This is a complete reversal fromHellboy II, whose plot was entirely original. Where del Toro invented with Mignola, Marshall adapts Mignola. The antagonist, Nimue the Blood Queen - played by Milla Jovovich - is a major character in the albums, a dismembered and scattered medieval witch whose return irrigates several cycles. Alice Monaghan, the medium kidnapped as a baby by the fairies, and Ben Daimio, the officer marked by a jaguar curse, also come from the corpus. And the Arthurian ancestry of Hellboy, a central revelation of the albums of this period, structures the film. On paper, everything was there.
Compress a decade of publication
The problem is not loyalty but quantity. The cycles summoned by the film extend, in the comics, over years of publication —Darkness Calls, drawn by Duncan Fegredo whose line succeeded that of Mignola on the main series,The Wild Hunt Then The Storm and the Fury form a slow progression, where each revelation arrives after dozens of pages of setup, silences and folkloric digressions. It is this breathing that gives the saga its power: Hellboy discovers his heritage reluctantly, over time, while the world turns upside down around him.
The film must say everything in two hours. The consequence is a permanent acceleration: the revelations follow one another without the viewer having time to attach an issue to them, the secondary characters appear and justify themselves in the same scene, and the action fills the gaps that the slowness occupied in the albums. Mignola's contemplative tone - these full pages where nothing is happening other than a landscape and a creature - has no equivalent on screen. For the reader, this is perhaps the most interesting lesson of this entire batch of articles: fidelity to events does not produce fidelity to experience. Del Toro, by inventing a story, had better recreated the sensation of reading Hellboy than Marshall by adapting the real ones.
A failure that closed the franchise
The result was severe. Released in April 2019, the film collapsed at the box office, far from making its budget, and critics panned it — criticizing precisely this breathless build-up, as well as an unstable tonal mix between graphic horror and humor. Its production had been turbulent, with disagreements reported between director and producers, and the classification for informed audiences - a choice consistent with the violence of the albums - reduced its potential audience without convincing fans of the genre.
The failure put a lasting end to the cinematographic projects: no sequel was filmed, and the franchise then took other paths, on a smaller scale. For the character, the consequence is paradoxical but not fatal: Hellboy never needed cinema. Mike Mignola continued to publish, himself closing the great cycle of his hero in his own way, and the universe of B.P.R.D. was completed according to a plan that its author mastered from start to finish - an extremely rare luxury in an industry where franchises never end. For the reader, it is even an invitation: unlike most comic book universes, this one has an ending, written by its creator. Few things are worth as much as a finished story.
The characters, from paper to screen
- Hellboy— The demon of the B.P.R.D., here confronted with his Arthurian heritage.
- Nimue the Blood Queen— Major antagonist of the albums, faithful in its principle.
- Alice Monaghan— The medium kidnapped by the fairies, coming from the corpus.
- Ben Daimio— The officer marked by a curse, character from the B.P.R.D.
- Professor Broom— The adoptive father, present in all versions.
Duncan Fegredo and the second graphic life of Hellboy
An aspect that the film indirectly highlights deserves the attention of collectors: the cycles it adapts are not drawn by Mike Mignola. From the mid-2000s, the author focused on the writing and direction of his universe, and entrusted the drawing of the main series to Duncan Fegredo, a British artist whose line - more organic, more detailed, but respectful of Mignolian composition - accompanies Hellboy throughout this decisive period, from Darkness Calls until the cycle concludes.
This transmission is one of the most discreet editorial successes of the medium: changing the designer on a series whose graphic identity is the main signature was a gamble, and it was won. For the collector, this creates two distinct families in the bibliography – the albums designed by Mignola himself, and those from the Fegredo period – each with its enthusiasts. The absolute key remains Hellboy: Seed of Destruction #1(1994), and the real first appearance in a 1993 promotional publication remains a rare piece for connoisseurs. But the issues from the period adapted by the 2019 film, widely available and reasonably priced, offer an interesting entry: they are the ones that contain the most important revelations of the character's mythology.
Where to start reading
To discover the source, you must first read Seed of Destruction(1994) to establish the character, then come to the cycles adapted by the film:Darkness Calls , The Wild Hunt and The Storm and the Fury, drawn by Duncan Fegredo, available in collections. This is where Arthurian heritage and the saga of Nimue play out — over hundreds of pages that the film condenses into two hours. The difference in pace is the real issue.
Chronology of comics to know
- 1993-1994— First promotional appearance, then Seed of Destruction #1.
- Mid 2000s— Duncan Fegredo takes over the drawing of the main series.
- Late 2000s— Darkness Calls then The Wild Hunt: the saga of Nimue.
- Early 2010s— The Storm and the Fury concludes the great cycle.
- 2019— The cinematic reboot compresses the whole thing.
Collection side: what numbers to aim for after the film
Hellboy 2019 points to the Fegredo period. The numbers of Darkness Calls , The Wild Hunt and The Storm and the Fury remain widely available and affordable, while they contain the most structuring revelations of mythology - the Arthurian heritage, the saga of Nimue. The key to the franchise remains Seed of Destruction #1(1994), with the 1993 promotional release as a rare item. The failure of the film having limited the "movie heat" effect, prices for the adapted period did not experience any boom - which makes it a favorable window. As always, condition and gradation determine value; relying on real recent sales is strongly recommended.
Its place in the saga and for the collector
Hellboy 2019 will remain as a demonstration that adapting the right events is not enough. More faithful to the letter than the two del Toro films, it is much less faithful to the reading experience, failing to reproduce the slowness and the silences that are the price of albums. Its failure closed the cinema franchise without affecting the paper franchise, which Mike Mignola brought to a true conclusion – a precious rarity. For the collector, it designates a major and still accessible editorial period, that designed by Duncan Fegredo. Hellboy 2019 reminds us that between fidelity and accuracy, an adaptation must sometimes choose.
The Verdict: Right Arcs, Wrong Tempo
- Loyalty: Nimue the Blood Queen, the Arthurian ancestry of Hellboy, Alice Monaghan, Ben Daimio, the Wild Hunt and the violence of the albums come from the comics.
- Freedoms: several entire cycles compressed into two hours, the slow build-up of the albums replaced by continuous action, no continuity with del Toro's films.
- Collectible numbers: Seed of Destruction #1 (1994), Darkness Calls / The Wild Hunt / The Storm and the Fury cycles.
Hellboy 2019 adapts real cycles by Mike Mignola – the saga of Nimue and the Arthurian legacy – where del Toro's films invented, but compresses years of publication into two hours and loses the breath that was their strength. A failure that closed the franchise in cinema, it refers to a major and still affordable editorial period.
Frequently asked questions
Mike Mignola confirmed that the film draws on Darkness Calls , The Wild Hunt and The Storm and the Fury, while taking up fragments of other stories, including the character's Mexican adventures. It's the opposite of Hellboy II, whose plot was original.
Literally, yes: he adapts real cycles and real characters. To the reading experience, no: the albums rely on a slow build-up, silences and folkloric digressions that compression into two hours makes impossible.
The Blood Queen, a dismembered and scattered medieval witch, whose return irrigates several cycles of the series. She is one of the major antagonists of the corpus, linked to the Arthurian heritage of Hellboy - a central revelation of the albums of this period.
No. The film flopped at the box office and was panned by critics, bringing a lasting end to the film projects. Mike Mignola, on the other hand, led his universe to a real conclusion on paper.
Seed of Destruction #1 (1994) remains key to the franchise, with the 1993 promotional release as a rare piece. The numbers of the adapted cycles — drawn by Duncan Fegredo — remain accessible even though they contain the most structuring revelations.
Does the film make you want to collect?Estimate the value for freeof your numbers (Seed of Destruction #1…) with our tool based on real eBay sales.