Thirty years without a color page: Terry Moore's choice — article illustration
⚡ Quick response

Terry Moore has never published a single page in color in over thirty years, and this is not a budget constraint.Black and white allows him to control everything - he writes, draws, inks and letters alone - but above all he does work that color would make impossible:his faces remain readable on the same scale from drama to horror, and nothing comes to prioritize attention in its place. This is the choice that best explains the coherence of his work.

In an industry where color is the absolute norm, there is a reason to last thirty years in black and white. It is not economical, or not only that.

This article explains what this choice allows, what it costs, and why it has very concrete consequences for who buys its books.

What color does, and refuses

To understand the choice, you must first see what coloring really brings to a comic page — beyond pleasure.

Shehierarchize: a character in bright red in the middle of a dull setting tells the reader where to look. Sheinformed: a cold dominant announces a night or tense scene without any dialogue stating it. And sheseparated: two characters dressed in distinct colors never merge, even when drawn quickly.

An author who renounces color therefore renounces three tools, and must replace them. The line alone must establish a hierarchy, the inking alone must inform, and the faces must be distinct enough so that two characters are never confused — without the help of blonde hair or a red sweater.

It is this last constraint which most visibly explains his manner.Its faces are designed to be recognized without color, which requires a graphic characterization that is significantly more advanced than the average for the medium.

What black and white allows him

Total control

A color page requires a colorist, therefore a speaker who interprets. In black and white, the author delivers the page as it will be printed.

For someone who writes, draws, inks and letters alone, it is the last link in the chain.

Continuity over thirty years

A colorist changes, a printing process evolves, a charter goes out of fashion. Black and white does not age in the same way: a page from 1993 and one from 2020 look the same.

The same register for all genres

Going from drama to horror then to comedy without changing palette produces a unity that color would have broken — each genre having its chromatic conventions.

An economy that makes independence possible

No colorist to pay, no additional printing costs. This is what has allowed an author to finance his own printing for three decades.

What it costs

Honesty requires us to say what this choice benefits, because it is not free.

It closes part of the readership.A fringe of readers associate black and white with austerity or incompleteness, and will not open the book. This is a real obstacle on the shelves, where the cover of a volume in color is more attractive.

It makes certain scenes more difficult.A crowd, a rapid confrontation, a complex setting: color would do the work of separation in an instant. In black and white, you have to compose the page differently, and certain action sequences in his work suffer from this.

It limits the appeal of variants.The alternative cover market is largely based on spectacular chromatic proposals. On a production entirely in black and white, this practice has never really caught on – which has direct consequences on its market.

The consequence for a collector.On modern indie series, the central question is “which of the eight covers do I have?” ". Here, it practically does not arise.

The decisive variable becomes thedraw: first or reprint. It's a complete shift in what to check before buying, and it surprises collectors accustomed to the variant market.

How its inking replaces color

Three processes constantly recur, and spotting them changes the reading.

Solid black as dominant.A night or tense scene is indicated by a proportion of black well above the average on the page. It is the exact equivalent of a cold cast, obtained without color.

White as breathing.Conversely, calm or funny scenes let white dominate, with backgrounds reduced to the essentials. The rhythm of the book can be read in this alternation even before the dialogues.

Hatching as volume.The faces are modeled by fine hatching, reserved for what matters. A foreground character is hatched, an extra is not — this is the hierarchy that color would have established.

These three processes are visible on any page, and once spotted they make his work much more readable than it appears at first glance.

The lettering, the other part of the device

One element generally goes unnoticed and yet completes the whole: this author writes his pages himself, by hand.

In current production, the lettering is entrusted to a specialist and produced afterwards, often using digital typography. The result is clean, regular, and perfectly neutral — it does not participate in the design.

Manual lettering executed by the designer does the opposite. The stroke of the letters is the same as that of the faces, the bubbles are inserted into the composition rather than superimposed on it, and a replica can thicken or tremble without this requiring any particular effect.The text belongs to the image instead of being placed on it.

On a black and white production, this continuity counts double. A page where everything – decor, faces, bubbles, text – comes from the same hand and the same ink achieves a homogeneity that the usual industrial chain does not allow to obtain, whatever the talents combined.

Black and white in American comics

A perspective is necessary, because this choice is not isolated and its history sheds light on the case.

Black and white has long been, in this medium, the format of publications that could not afford color: magazines, fanzines, small publications. It therefore carried a connotation of amateurism which it took decades to get rid of.

Several major independent series from the 1980s and 1990s helped to overturn this perception, by demonstrating that a long and ambitious story could unfold.Economic constraint has gradually become a claimed aesthetic choice.

The case that concerns us is located exactly at this turning point: started in the early 1990s in a context where black and white remained suspect, continued until today when it is no longer so. The consistency of the author preceded the legitimization of the format.

What this changes when purchasing

Three practical consequences, which do not relate to aesthetics.

The condition of the paper matters more.On a color page, a slight yellowing goes unnoticed. On black and white, it directly modifies the relationship between the values, and it is immediately visible. This is a condition criterion to be examined closely on old fascicles.

The print quality is visible.Poor printing crushes the blacks or dulls the hatching. Between a careful first print and an economical reprint, the difference can be visible to the naked eye — an additional clue to identifying what you own.

Variants practically do not exist.So there's nothing to look for in that regard, and the budget focuses entirely on mintage and condition.

How to recognize it in three seconds

For a reader who is discovering his work, knowing what he is looking at helps him not to miss it. Three signs can be found on any board.

Very worked eyes.Lacking color, the expression rests almost entirely on the gaze, and he devotes disproportionate attention to it compared to the rest of the face.

Disappearing backgrounds.In a tense dialogue scene, the setting often fades to white. This is not an ease: it is the hierarchy that the color would have made, obtained by removing rather than adding.

Pure blacks, never grays.It uses very few screens and halftones. The page is composed of white and black, with hatching everything in between — which gives his plates an immediately recognizable sharpness, even in poor quality reproduction.

What to record

Black and white simplifies inventory on one point and complicates it on another.

What disappears: the cover.No need to note which of the variants we have, since there are almost none. This is one less field compared to contemporary independent series.

What becomes central: the draw.First or later, readable on the inside credits page. This is the only information that separates two apparently identical copies.

What is added: the condition of the paper.Whiteness, flatness, absence of yellowing. On old black and white, these criteria weigh more than on a color booklet of the same age, and they are described in full rather than by a note.

An inventory adapted to this bibliography is therefore not that which we consider to be a modern series. It has fewer fields, but each counts more.

One last clarification deserves to be included if you buy old fascicles: theprint qualityherself. Between a careful first print and an economical reprint, blacks can become crushed and hatching become caked to the point that the difference is visible to the naked eye. It is a useful clue to identify what one has when the credits page is silent or absent, and it is information which is never found afterwards if one does not record it when one has the copy in hand.

Frequently asked questions

It is partly so – no colorists to pay, lower printing costs – and this is what makes self-publishing viable over three decades. But reducing this choice to its economy would be wrong: it produces a unity of register between very different genres that color, with its conventions specific to each genre, would have broken.

Not in this specific case, because the inking explicitly replaces the functions of color: solid black indicates tension, white breathing, and hatching hierarchizes the planes. Faces are also designed to be recognized without the help of hair or clothing color.

Because the alternative cover market is largely based on spectacular chromatic proposals, which make no sense on an entirely black and white production. This absence shifts the central question for the collector: it is no longer “what cover?” » but “what draw?” ".

Yes, and this is a point rarely mentioned. On a color page, slight yellowing goes unnoticed; on black and white, it modifies the relationship between the values ​​and is immediately visible. On thirty-year-old issues, this is a condition criterion to be examined very closely.

No, and this is consistent with all of the above: colorizing after the fact a work whose inking already assumes the functions of color would amount to doubling the information. The pages are not designs awaiting color, they are finished as is.

One less field, one field that matters more

No variation to note, but a print to verify - and a state of paper to describe in full.

7-day free trial