The Doomsday comics illustrate a paradox: they are among the most sold of history, therefore among the least rare. The value does not come from the number but from its state and its edition . Superman #75 alone exists in eight distinct versions in the catalog, and confusing one with the other is the most costly mistake in the segment.
There are two ways to approach a comic's rating. On old titles, we look for what has survived. On the titles from 1992, we look for what stands out from a mass of identical copies. Doomsday falls entirely into the second case.
This difference is not a detail of method: it reverses the purchasing logic. The reflexes acquired on the silver age keys lead here to systematically wrong decisions.
The paradox of success
The death of Superman is one of the rare comic book events to have crossed the boundaries of the specialized readership. Television news, general press, buyers who had never set foot in a bookstore: the affair mobilized a considerable public, convinced of acquiring a historical object.
This audience bought, then kept. Copies slept for thirty years in cupboards, often without even being opened, precisely because their owners considered them an investment.
The result is mechanical: the market today is full of examples in good condition. What was supposed to make it rare – the importance of the event – produced exactly the opposite. A comic that everyone has put aside cannot become rare.
We must draw the consequences without bitterness. These issues remain excellent collectibles, easy to find, enjoyable to read and affordable. They are simply not the investment their first buyers imagined.
1992, the year the market went crazy
To understand the current rating, we must place ourselves in the climate of the time. The beginning of the 1990s saw the convergence of several phenomena which, together, produced a bubble.
Print runs reached levels never seen since. Publishers are multiplying the methods intended to trigger purchases: alternative covers, numbered editions, printing effects, issues presented as historical. A specialized press publishes monthly quotes which give the reader the feeling of following a financial asset.
Many buyers then stop reading to stock up. We buy two copies — one to read, one to keep sealed — and the second is never opened. It is exactly this behavior that destroyed the future rarity of the numbers concerned.
The correction came a few years later, brutally, and the market took a long time to recover. Comics from the 1990s maintain a lasting, sometimes excessive, reputation: not everything is worthless during this period, but nothing becomes rare simply by the effect of time.
The lesson is valid for today. A massively purchased number because we believe it to be precious does not become so — it is even the best guarantee of the contrary.
Superman #75: eight editions, one title
The number of death —Superman #75, cover January 1993, put on sale on November 19, 1992, script and art by Dan Jurgens — is the most confusing case of the segment. The catalog lists eight distinct lines for this number alone.
There is a memorial edition, a version intended for the specialized bookstore circuit, a newsstand version, a so-called platinum edition, as well as second, third and fourth reprints - the latter itself existing in a newsstand variant.
These editions are not equal, and the gap between them is considerable. However, nothing distinguishes them at first glance: same cover, same number, same story. A seller in good faith can make mistakes; a seller in bad faith can maintain confusion without explicitly lying.
The practical rule is contained in one sentence:on this number, ask for a photo of the barcode and the imprint. That's where the actual edition reads, not in the title of the ad. A seller who refuses this photo already informs you.
The cameo and full appearance
The other point of attention concerns the character's first two appearances.Superman: The Man of Steel #17 contains a one-panel cameo; THE #18 shows the creature for the first time.
The market values #18 more, more in demand and easier to compare. #17 retains the advantage of chronological precedence and generally trades below it.
Again, an ad can present one or the other as "first appearance" without lying. Read the number in the photo rather than the wording in the title.
Why the note is everything
On a mass circulation, the value is not distributed progressively along the rating scale: it is concentrated at its peak.
The reason is arithmetic. When tens of thousands of copies are circulating in good condition, a merely clean copy has nothing to distinguish it — it is interchangeable with thousands of others, and its price tends toward that of an ordinary comic. Only near-perfect examples stand out from the crowd.
Hence a very steep step in the last half points of the scale. Going from a very fine copy to an impeccable copy does not cost extra: it changes price category.
This reality has a direct consequence on the decision to graduate. On a 1992 comic, grading is only of interest if you have serious reason to believe that the copy will reach the top of the scale. Below, the cost of the service almost always exceeds the expected gain.
Three defects are enough to prohibit high notes, and they are frequent during this period: an off-center spine when trimming, a binding whose staples have marked the paper, and whitening of the spine fold, very visible on the dark covers of the saga.
What retains value, what does not
The segment hierarchy is fairly stable, and it helps to know it before searching.
At the top, the first two appearances and the death number, in their original editions and in impeccable condition. This is the only place where a significant amount of money is justified.
In the middle, the other issues of the saga: they form a coherent sequence, are found everywhere and cost little. Their interest is in reading and collecting, not in valorization.
At the bottom, the reprints , THE collections and the later reissues. They have no collectible value, regardless of their condition. This does not disqualify them: they are the best objects for reading the story without handling a valuable copy.
A particular case deserves to be noted: the apparitions posterior of the character, in the following decades. They have never regained the impact of 1992 and trade at the price of ordinary comics, including when they occupy the cover.
Estimate correctly: the procedure to follow
Four steps, in this order, avoid most errors.
Identify the edition above all else. In this segment, this is the point that causes the price to vary the most, even before the condition. A perfect copy of the bad edition is worth less than an average copy of the good one.
Note the condition without complacency. Look at the spine fold in raking light, check the centering of the cover in relation to the spine, look for staple marks. A copy that looks “like new” to the naked eye often turns out to be average upon inspection.
Compare to closed sales. The prices displayed are not binding on anyone and remain online indefinitely. In a segment as abundant as this, actual transactions are numerous: there is no excuse for referring to requests.
Compare with identical edition and note. A record sale for a rare edition graded at the top doesn't tell you anything about your ungraded newsstand copy. This is the most common misinterpretation on the market.
Avoiding ad pitfalls
Three formulations should trigger a systematic check.
«Doomsday's first appearance» without a specific number: ask which one, #17 or #18. Both formulas are defensible and the prices differ.
«The death of Superman» without mention of edition: on an issue which exists in eight versions, this is insufficient. Request the barcode and legal notice page.
«Rare ", " not found ", " limited edition»: in 1992 comics, these qualifiers are almost always false. They signal either a lack of knowledge of the market or an intention to manipulate it.
One last piece of advice, valid for any purchase during this period: favor sellers who document defects. On such widespread comics, an honest and detailed description is better than a flattering and unverifiable stated condition.
Protect what you buy
On issues whose entire value is based on condition, storage is not a maintenance detail: it is what decides whether your copy will hold its grade in ten years.
Paper from the 1990s ages better than that of previous decades, but it remains vulnerable on three points. There light attacks the inks, and the dark covers of this saga are visibly changing. There pressure creates permanent creases: a pile that is too heavy is enough to lose half a point. L'humidity, finally, curls the paper irreversibly.
The appropriate protection is simple: neutral support pouch and cardboard, vertical storage without tightening, far from any source of direct light, in a heated and dry room. Avoid soft PVC sleeves, which degrade over time and can mark the cover.
One point specific to this segment is worth noting. Copies sold in sealed packaging pose a dilemma: opening allows you to know the real condition, but loses the integrity of the packaging. There is no universal right answer — just know that sealed packaging in no way guarantees the condition of what it contains, as manufacturing defects predate the packaging.
Finally, keep an inventory of what you own, with the exact edition, condition and price paid. On a corpus where eight versions of the same number coexist, memory is not enough, and it is this reading that will prevent you from repurchasing what you already have.
To learn more, see ouranalysis of the first two appearancesand thereading guide.
Frequently asked questions
It depends entirely on the edition and condition, not the number. The catalog lists eight distinct versions of this single issue: memorial edition, version for specialized bookstores, newsstand version, platinum edition and three successive reprints. The differences between them are considerable, even though nothing distinguishes them at first glance.
By the barcode and the legal notices page, never by the title of the ad. Demand a clear photo of these two areas before any purchase. The cover, number and story being identical from one edition to another, no other element allows us to decide reliably.
They didn't deliver on the promise their 1992 buyers saw in them. The event mobilized a very large audience who purchased and then kept the copies, often without opening them. The market is therefore full of examples in good condition. They remain excellent collectibles, accessible and easy to find, but they are not investments.
Only if you have good reason to believe he will reach the top of the rating scale. Below, the cost of the service almost always exceeds the gain. First check the spine fold in grazing light, the centering of the cover and the staple marks: these three defects, common over the period, prohibit high grades.
Those that announce “the first appearance of Doomsday” without specifying whether it is #17 or #18, those that sell “the death of Superman” without mentioning the edition, and all those that use the words rare, unobtainable or limited edition. In 1992 comics, these qualifiers are almost always inaccurate.
No. The character has been reused numerous times since 1992 without ever regaining the impact of the original story. Her subsequent appearances are traded at the price of ordinary comics, including when they occupy the cover. The value of the corpus remains concentrated on the 1992 saga.
Track the price of your Doomsday comics and your entire collection with My Comics Collection.
Discover the application