Crisis on Infinite Earths versus the 1985 comics

Adapt not a story, but an administrative decision. Decryption source by source, without disclosing the outcomes.

As in each article in this series, only verified information (creators, distribution, dates, publishers) is stated; the comparative analysis is ours, without reproducing dialogue or protected images.

1985: a household, not a story

It is necessary to be precise on what was Crisis on Infinite Earths, because its nature explains everything else.

In 1985, DC had been publishing for almost fifty years. THEmultiverse invented in 1961to resolve one inconsistency produced thousands of others: several versions of each character, numbered Earths, contradictory histories. A new reader can no longer enter.

The publisher therefore decides to rethink everything. The mission entrusted to Marv Wolfman and George Perez is not to write a good story: it is to destroy the multiverse and to emerge with a single Earth, a single chronology, and a catalog that is readable again.

The twelve resulting issues are therefore a hybrid object – a fiction whose specifications are administrative. What happens there (worlds disappear, characters die) directly reflects management decisions: this one is no longer useful, that one contradicts the new rule.

This corpus showed aboutSupergirlwhat this meant in concrete terms for a popular character: she dies in issue 7 because Superman had to become the sole survivor of Krypton again. No narrative motive, a structural rule.

An event that has become a genre

The operation had a side effect that no one had anticipated, and which still weighs heavily today.

It worked very well commercially. Twelve issues, all the characters, maximum stakes: the readers followed. The industry drew a conclusion — a transversal event sells better than a regular title.

Since then, the two major publishers have published them regularly. What was an exceptional operation, justified by a real necessity, has become a periodic appointment. And the necessity disappeared along the way: we no longer start over because we have to, we do it because it sells.

For the reader, the consequence is concrete and often discouraging. Events force you to buy titles you don't follow, interrupt ongoing stories, and their consequences are frequently undone a few years later. This is one of the major barriers to entry in contemporary superhero comics — a problem that the 1985 reboot was intended to solve.

2019: adapt a household, and turn it around

The 2019 television crossover uses the device, with the same industrial function: unifying a set of series that has become difficult to manage, bringing together incompatible tones, integrating versions of the same character from other eras and other channels.

But he reverses the result. Where the 1985 comic destroyed the multiverse, the 2019 crossover preserves.

This reversal is not a betrayal: it is a fair reading of what has changed between the two eras. In 1985, the multiverse was a liability — it made the catalog unreadable. In 2019, it's a active: it allows competing versions of the same character to be used simultaneously, on different media, without one invalidating the other.

What the crossover adapts is therefore not the outcome of 1985 but its gesture: summon everything you have, sacrifice part of it, and come out with a set that works. The purpose is opposite, the method identical.

The characters, from paper to screen

• The heroes of the series— Protagonists, instead of the figures on the paper.
• Guest versions— Coming from other eras and other productions.
• The Ghost— Cosmic entity retained from the comic.
• The threat— Eraser of worlds, like in 1985.
• The sacrifices— Present, but redistributed.

The only object that this corpus had not encountered

It is worth measuring what this case adds, because it completes a typology built on around fifty lots.

This corpus examined adaptations of stories— an arc, an origin. Adaptations of characters without a narrative of its own. An adaptation of magnitude, when the Justice League transposed the shared universe itself. A following, when Watchmen chose to continue rather than remake. A loan, when a film took a setting without its subject. And a series without source at all.

This one was missing: the adaptation of a edition event. That is to say, an object whose purpose was not to tell but to reorganize a catalog.

And the remarkable fact is that the transposition works, precisely because the problem was reproduced identically. A chain accumulates series, continuities and competing versions; she encounters exactly the difficulty that a comic book publisher encountered in 1985; she uses the same remedy.

It is the most complete demonstration of what this corpus has gradually established: what is best transmitted from comics to the screen is neither their stories nor their characters, but their management solutions. The multiverse, the shared universe, the transversal event — three tools invented to solve publishing problems, all adopted by the audiovisual sector as soon as it reached the same scale.

George Pérez, or drawing the impossible

A word about the designer, because his contribution explains why this comic stands up despite its administrative specifications.

The problem posed to George Perez was considerable: representing hundreds of characters, often in the same box, without the page becoming illegible. No other superhero story had required this on this scale.

Its solution is based on a rigorous organization of depth. The figures do not pile up: they are distributed in planes, with silhouettes distinct enough to be identified at a glance, and breathing zones which prevent saturation. A reader can skim a double page spread and recognize thirty characters effortlessly.

It is a know-how specifically printed, and this corpus has repeatedly shown that it does not transpose. On screen, showing thirty characters simultaneously produces mush; the viewer does not control his reading time and cannot focus on a detail. The 2019 crossover never attempts the equivalent – ​​it parades its guests rather than bringing them together.

This is another reason to buy these issues rather than just the adaptation. What Pérez produced in 1985 does not exist anywhere else and cannot exist elsewhere: it is a performance that only the page allows.

Collection side: which numbers to aim for after the crossing

Crisis on Infinite Earths #1(1985) opens the series. Its profile is that, now familiar, of the keys of the 1980s: large circulation, very popular event series, therefore number common and inexpensive. It is easy to find.

Crisis on Infinite Earths #7(1985) is the number that counts. It contains the death of Supergirl, and especially its cover - Superman carrying the body of his cousin - is one of the most reproduced and pastiche images of the history of the medium. It has been hijacked dozens of times, including by competing publishers.

This number perfectly illustrates a point that this corpus has established: a picture can carry more cultural value than a story, while remaining materially banal. #7 can be found for a few dollars, and it's probably the most recognizable cover you can buy at this price.

For a collector building a collection to tell stories rather than resell, this is an obvious purchase. This corpus repeats it: the segment of historically major but common numbers— Watchmen #1, Saga of the Swamp Thing #21, The Man of Steel #1, Crisis #7 — offers the best ratio between what you get and what you pay for.

As always, condition and gradation determine value; relying on real recent sales is strongly recommended.

Where to start reading

Crisis on Infinite Earths can be read in twelve issues, but you must be warned: it is a dense story, populated by hundreds of characters, and designed for a reader from 1985 who knew them all. A reader today will especially see George Pérez's drawing, which remains astonishingly dense.

Le #7 alone is understood without the rest, and it is the one that must be read as a priority.

Timeline to know

• 1961— The Flash #123 invents the multiverse to resolve an inconsistency.
• 1985— Crisis on Infinite Earths destroys it, making it unmanageable.
• 1985— Success transforms the event into a recurring event.
• 2019— Television is using the system to unify its series.
• 2020— It preserves the multiverse: it has become an asset.

Its place in the saga and for the collector

This crossing will remain as the only case in this corpus where the adapted object is a edition event— an operation whose purpose was not to tell but to reorganize a catalog. It returns the result of 1985, and rightly so: the multiverse was then a liability, it has become an asset. Above all, it completes the demonstration built on fifty lots - what is best transmitted from comics to the screen is neither their stories nor their characters, but their management solutions. For the collector, it leads to Crisis #7: a few euros for one of the most reproduced covers in the medium.

The verdict: the gesture guarded, the outcome reversed

• Loyalty: the threat erasing worlds, the scale of the catalog summoned, the sacrifices of major figures, the recasting of continuity as a goal and cosmic entities.
• Freedoms: a multiverse preserved instead of being destroyed, protagonists from the series, deaths redistributed, five episodes versus twelve issues and a reason for reunion rather than simplification.
• Collectible numbers: Crisis on Infinite Earths #1 and especially #7 (1985).

A 1961 editor invents the multiverse to patch up an inconsistency. An editor in 1985 destroyed it because it got out of control. A 2019 channel saves it because it became profitable. The same idea, three times, for three purely industrial reasons - and it is this idea that popular fiction has retained.

Frequently asked questions