Justice League: Doom versus The Tower of Babel by Mark Waid

A four-issue arc of which a single idea was enough to reconfigure a character for twenty years. Decryption source by source, without disclosing the outcomes.

As in each article in this series, only verified information (creators, distribution, dates, publishers) is stated; the comparative analysis is ours, without reproducing dialogue or protected images.

The Tower of Babel (2000): the idea that redefined Batman

The Tower of Babel appeared in JLA #43 to #46, in 2000, written by Mark Waid and drawn by Howard Porter. The JLA series was then at the height of its influence, relaunched a few years earlier around a simple idea — bringing together the seven most powerful characters in the catalog and giving them threats on their scale.

The arc starts with a revelation: Batman has created, for each member of the League, a file detailing how to neutralize them. Physical weaknesses, psychological vulnerabilities, appropriate countermeasures — one plan per teammate, prepared in secret, in case one of them flips. These files are stolen and used against their subjects, methodically, each member being incapacitated by whatever means their own ally had imagined.

The action story is effective, but it is not what made its posterity. It is the idea itself, and the debate it opens. Was Batman right? The argument in its favor is strong: these characters can indeed destroy a city, and planning for the eventuality is basic prudence. The argument against it is just as strong: he made these plans without informing anyone, which is no longer prudence but defiance, and he did it towards people who trusted him.

The strength of the bow is not to cut. Waid leaves both readings open-ended, and this is what has allowed the concept to survive—taken up, discussed, and developed by countless authors since, until it has become a permanent feature of the character. Few four-issue arcs have had such an effect.

The change of sponsor

The 2012 adaptation retains the structure and device, but replaces the character who steals the files and orchestrates the attacks. The original story attributed the theft to an adversary whose personal relationship with Batman gave the betrayal special resonance; the film entrusts this role to another antagonist, and adds around him a large-scale plan which did not exist in the comic.

This type of substitution has become familiar to us over the course of this batch —HushetGotham by Gaslightdid the same. The difference is that The Tower of Babel is not a mystery story: the identity of the sponsor is not a revelation prepared by clues, it is a starting point. The substitution therefore costs much less than elsewhere – it deprives the story of an intimate resonance, but it does not weaken any mechanism.

The film also adds a global objective to its antagonist, where the comic focused on the League itself. It's an addition of format: a feature film expects an issue commensurate with it, while a series arc can allow itself to be an internal incident. The price to pay is a dilution of the subject — the story is a little less about trust and a little more about saving the world.

What the movie can't have: the sequel

The main loss is of a type already encountered onFlashpoint, but in a softer form.

In the comic, the sanction inflicted on Batman has consequences that extend well beyond the four issues: the character bears the mark for years, the question of his reliability comes up regularly, and other authors build on this legacy. The arc is not a closed episode, it is a tipping point in a long continuity.

A standalone film obviously can't deliver that. He recounts the crisis and its resolution, and it all ends there. This is the structural limit of adapting an arc from a long-term series: what gave the story its weight was knowing that it would have sequels. This observation applies to almost all adaptations of runs, and it explains why autonomous stories – Elseworlds, anniversary issues, closed mini-series – generally adapt better.

The characters, from paper to screen

• Batman— Author of the plans, and tried for having concealed them.
• The League— Each member neutralized by the means provided for them.
• The sponsor— Different character between the comic and the film.
• Cyborg— Whose on-screen presence reflects the League of his era.

Dwayne McDuffie, and the JLA of the year 2000

Two contextual details, which give this title particular value.

The first concerns the film: its screenplay is the last written by Dwayne McDuffie, who died in 2011, before the release. A recognized author and producer, he co-founded a publisher dedicated to the diversification of comic book characters and worked extensively on DC animated series, including several devoted to the League. The film is dedicated to him, and his writing – tight, attentive to the distribution of speech between the members of the team – bears his mark.

The second concerns the source. The JLA series, relaunched at the end of the 1990s, constituted one of DC's great critical and commercial successes of the period, at a time when the market was just emerging from the collapse of the speculative bubble. Mark Waid takes over the writing after a very noted first author, and The Tower of Babel is the peak of his passage. Howard Porter, designer of the series, deploys a broad style adapted to large-scale confrontations.

For the collector, these numbers belong in the same window asThe Long Halloweenand Action Comics #775: titles published after the collapse, at historically low print runs, and therefore rarer than their date suggests.

Collection side: what numbers to aim for after the film

JLA #43(2000) is the entry point of the arc, and the number on which the attention is focused. Its value rests on the reputation of the story and the lasting influence of its central idea, rather than on a first appearance - a configuration comparable to that of Action Comics #775, with the same consequences: a moderate rating, a stable market, little speculative interest.

Numbers 44 to 46 complete the arc and are inexpensive, making it easy to bring the set together. The real advantage of this segment is the circulation: we are in 2000, in a window where printing levels were among the lowest in the modern history of the medium. The high grade offer is therefore more limited than for many older and more renowned numbers.

Collections, regularly republished, remain the economical way to read. As always, condition and gradation determine value; relying on real recent sales is strongly recommended.

Where to start reading

JLA #43(2000) opens the arc, which can be read in an hour and requires no prior knowledge of the series. The reader coming from the film will find the device identical, with a different sponsor and a more intimate resonance - and without the overall plan added by the adaptation, which refocuses the story on its real subject: trust.

Timeline to know

• Late 1990s— JLA is relaunched and becomes a major success.
• 2000— JLA #43-46: The Tower of Babel, by Waid and Porter.
• Years 2000-2020— The idea of ​​backup plans becomes a permanent Batman trait.
• 2012— The animated film, latest screenplay by Dwayne McDuffie.

Its place in the saga and for the collector

Justice League: Doom will remain as the adaptation of an arc in which a single idea was enough to reconfigure a character for two decades. The film preserves this idea and the debate it opens, which is the essential thing; it changes the sponsor – an inexpensive substitution, being a starting point and not a revelation – and adds an overall issue which slightly dilutes the subject. What he can't have is the sequel: in the comic, the punishment inflicted on Batman unfolds over years. For the collector, JLA #43 belongs to the lowest print run window in modern history, with a moderate rating due to lack of speculative interest.

The verdict: the idea kept, the continuity lost

• Loyalty: Batman's backup plans, their flight, the limb-by-limb targeted attacks, the crisis of confidence and the punishment come from the comic.
• Freedoms: a different sponsor, the composition of the League adjusted, an overall plan added, attacks partially rewritten — and the issue of continuity, absent by nature.
• Collectible numbers: JLA #43 (2000, DC), then #44 to #46.

Justice League: Doom preserves what matters in The Tower of Babel: the idea that Batman prepared the elimination of his own allies, and the refusal to settle the debate that it opens. What he can't carry is what the comic produced next — twenty years of consequences. Pour le lecteur comme pour le collectionneur, c'est une invitation à ouvrir JLA #43.

Frequently asked questions