The difficulty of this file is neither the price nor the rarity: it is define what counts as an appearance. In sixty years as a permanent guest, the heroine appears in hundreds of booklets, from a single panel to an entire story. Before buying anything, you must therefore set a presence threshold— we offer three, which produce three collections of very different sizes. Also pay attention to trap of two names, father and daughter being almost homonyms.
On most characters, the collector's question is "where to find this number". Here she is “does this number count”.
Failing to answer them at the start, we accumulate for years without ever knowing if we are progressing — a frustrating situation that this guide aims to avoid.
The real problem: where an apparition stops
Let's start by measuring the scope of the issue.
This heroine almost never had a magazine in her name. It has lived since 1964 in the publications of others: teams, invitations, transversal events, horror series, stories from a single issue. His presence goes from the silhouette in the background to the main role.
However, the lists of appearances do not distinguish these situations. An automatic census treats in the same way an issue where she leads the plot and another where she passes through a crowd box.
Three unfortunate consequences result if we do not decide.
The list becomes unmanageable. Several hundred entries, the vast majority of which are of no interest to anyone who likes this character.
Progress becomes invisible. Buying thirty booklets does not bring you closer to any objective, for lack of a defined objective.
The budget is dispersed. We buy a lot of mediocre numbers instead of a few good ones.
The solution lies in a prior decision:choose a threshold, write it down, and stick to it.
Three thresholds, three collections
Here are the three levels of requirements that we see working, from narrowest to broadest.
Threshold 1 — Coverage. Only the issues where it appears on the cover illustration are counted. It is an objective criterion, verifiable on photos, and which requires no interpretation. He produces a collection short, coherent and visually homogeneous, ideal for those who exhibit their pieces. It is also the most economical threshold, because it mechanically eliminates hundreds of interior appearances.
Threshold 2 — The role. Count the booklets where it acts on the plot: it resolves, it triggers, it prevents. This criterion is fairer in substance but it requires opening the booklet or obtaining information. He produces a collection average, rich in readings, and it's the one we recommend to most people.
Threshold 3 — Presence. Everything counts, including a silent appearance. This threshold produces a collection very long, costly in time and poor in satisfaction. We advise against it, unless documentary completeness in itself is your pleasure — which is a perfectly respectable motive, but one that is best assumed up front.
Advice on choice:start with threshold 1, even if it means widening afterwards. The opposite does not work - you cannot reduce an already established collection without an unpleasant feeling of hindsight.
The trap of two names
This file involves an identification difficulty that no other in our corpus presents in this form.
The character has a magician father, created twenty-six years earlier, whose name only differs from his own by its ending. Two syllables separate the two, both written and spoken.
This proximity produces constant confusion, and in both directions.
Advertisements attribute the girl's booklets to the father, which has no financial consequences since the girl is more in demand — you then pay less than the real value.
Announcements attribute the father's papers to the daughter, and there the damage is direct. The publications featuring the magician date back to the 1930s and 1940s, in anthology titles, and they have nothing to do with what you are looking for.
Automatic searches mix the two. A short string of characters is contained in a longer string: any search on the father's name also goes back to the daughter's papers, and the sorting tools get lost.
The solution is simple:think by date. Before August 1964, it could only be the father. Afterwards, check the title of the series and the year, never just the name.
The Spine: The Complete Stories
Whatever the threshold chosen, we recommend building the collection around a specific core:the publications where she plays the main role.
There aren't many of them, which is good news. A series from 1993, another launched in May 2010 – the only one to have lasted –, a complete story from 2014, a long volume published in October 2023, then two recent series in 2024 and 2025.
This ten or so references presents three decisive advantages.
They are easy to identify. Unlike scattered apparitions, you can make a complete list on a sheet of paper and know exactly where you are.
They cost little. None are rare, and most can be found in perfect condition without difficulty.
They can be read. This is the essential point: a collection in which each piece can be read remains alive, where a collection of occasional appearances becomes a catalog.
Ourbest runsindicate the order in which to approach them.
The five founding papers
The second core is made up of the introductory sequence, spread between August 1964 and December 1966 across five different magazines.
These booklets pose an unusual storage problem, and it is best to resolve it right away. They belong to five distinct series, dedicated to five different heroes. Should they be classified together, as a sequence, or each with its original title?
Our position:classify them together, as a whole in their own right, and write it down. This is the only case in this guide where we recommend breaking the classification by series, for a simple reason - these five numbers mean nothing separately, and their documentary value lies precisely in their union.
If your collection also includes the host series, a reference sheet avoids having to search for twenty minutes for an issue that you think is lost. It is exactly this type of situation that ourtracking toolallows you to keep up to date effortlessly.
Finding a guest: the method that works
Once the threshold has been set, the practical question remains: how to identify the issues concerned, since they are scattered throughout the entire output of a publisher over sixty years?
Three approaches produce results, in order of decreasing effectiveness.
Starting from the authors. It is by far the most profitable. A screenwriter who appreciates this character uses him several times, in the different series he writes. Identifying two or three recurring authors gives access to dozens of relevant booklets, which no list of appearances brings together.
Starting from series with a supernatural theme. It occurs much more often than in pure action titles, for an obvious reason of register. Scanning these series period by period is more productive than searching for its name.
Starting from the covers. If you have selected the first threshold, cover collections and illustrated catalogs do the work for you, and they allow you to spot at a glance issues that no one advertises under their name.
What doesn't work, however, is searching by name on marketplaces. She goes back to the publications in her name, which you already know, and misses the essential thing - plus the father's papers, for the reasons explained above.
A collection that never ends
We might as well announce it clearly: this file has no end.
The character has been published continuously since 1964, he appears regularly in others, and there is no sign of this stopping. Unlike figures used intermittently, whose collection can be declared closed, this one grows each year.
Three ways to live with it, depending on your temperament.
Stop the collection on a date. You decide not to acquire anything beyond a given year. It is arbitrary, it is assumed, and it transforms an open set into a finite set.
Only follow posts in their name. You ignore the apparitions and only keep the series and stories dedicated to him. The pace becomes very bearable: a few titles per decade.
Accept the opening. You consider collecting to be a practice, not an objective. It is the most serene position, provided you have chosen it rather than suffered it.
What doesn't work, however, is aiming for completeness without having decided on it. This is the best way to get discouraged after two years.
What we can ignore
Modern alternative covers. Recent series have up to eleven per issue. No structural scarcity, and a premium that evaporates in a few months, as detailed in ourrating analysis.
The appearances of a box. They fall under threshold 3, which we do not recommend. Listing them brings nothing in and is extremely busy.
The father's papers. Unless there is a specific project, they constitute an entirely separate file, old, expensive, and unrelated to what interests you.
Entire transversal events. She participates in several major collective stories from her publisher, which sometimes extend over dozens of issues spread across as many series. Buying the whole thing for a few boards where she appears amounts to building a collection of which she is no longer the subject. Remember only the issues where she acts, and read the rest in collection if the plot interests you.
A final word, in the form of encouragement. This file often discourages beginners because it is unlike anything they have been taught: no series to follow, no numbering, no obvious list. Once the threshold has been set and the core formed, it becomes on the contrary one of the most pleasant to experience - precisely because each discovery there results from personal research and not from a box to be checked.
The beginnings and their particularities are the subject of aseparate study.
Common questions about this character
Through the publications where it plays the main role: around ten references, easy to list on a sheet, inexpensive, and above all readable. It is this core which gives its backbone to the whole. Scattered spawns come next, if you decide to expand.
By setting a threshold before buying. Three work: coverage — objective criterion, verifiable on photos, which produces a short and homogeneous collection; the role in the plot — more accurate but requiring information; or simple presence, which we advise against unless completeness in itself is your pleasure.
Thinking by date. The father is a magician created twenty-six years earlier, whose name differs only by its ending. Before August 1964, it can only be him. Next, check the series title and year rather than just the name — automatic searches systematically mix the two, with a short string contained within a longer one.
Together, as a set in its own right, contrary to our usual recommendation of sorting by series. These five numbers belong to five different titles and mean nothing separately: their documentary value lies in their union. Provide a referral form if you also own the host series.
No, unless you decide. The character has been published continuously since 1964 and appears regularly in others. Three options: stop on a chosen date, only follow publications in your name, or accept openness as a practice rather than a goal. What doesn't work is aiming for completeness without having decided on it.
Especially not. Start with the narrowest, then expand: the opposite does not work, because you cannot reduce an already established collection without an unpleasant feeling of hindsight. The coverage threshold also has the advantage of being verifiable without opening the booklet.
No, with one exception. Apart from the August 1964 issue, the entire file is at very accessible levels, including the four other founding episodes and all of the modern series. The difficulty of this file is methodological, not financial.
Ignore them. Recent series have up to eleven for the same issue, without any structural rarity, and their premium disappears a few months after publication. Get the regular edition unless you specifically like an image — in which case buy it for its own sake, not out of calculation.
Fix your list and track your missing items with My Comics Collection.
Discover the application